Before the pitch. Before the attorney.

Find out who else does this before the investor asks.

Marklode drills through your idea the way a VC associate would: the competitors, the patents, the attacks, the verdict. The check before a five-figure patent search, in 24 to 72 hours.

Scroll to drill in
Four layers. One verdict. Now watch it work on a real idea.
Case file · Stress Test No. 0001

A founder sent two paragraphs and a plan to file a patent.

This is what came back, published with their permission. Scroll through the same four layers every report goes through.

idea_brief.txtreceived 2026-09-10
A credential for AI agents that is consumed by use. The agent gets a fixed number of one-time keys — say 200 — and each API request burns one. The number of keys remaining is the agent's authority; when it hits zero, the agent stops. If a key is ever used twice, that proves the credential was cloned.
214
sources reviewed
31
sources cited
48h
turnaround
1
decisive patent
01 · Landscape

Who is already here.

Before anything else, we map the room: identity platforms, payment protocols, standards drafts, and who just bought whom.

Your idea Google AP2 Stripe ACP Open Banking VRP Arcade.dev$72M raised IETF AAT IETF ACT / ARC Okta Entra Astrix Aembit Keycard WorkOS
already count actionsagent identityfunded category leaderstandards drafts

Eight acquisitions since December 2025

Palo Alto Networks → CyberArk~$25B
Cyera → Oasis~$1B
Cisco → Astrix$400M

Finding. Counted authority is not empty ground. It is already absorbed into AP2, Stripe and Open Banking as protocol fields that nobody enforces.

02 · Prior art

Every element, already claimed.

US10129034B2“Signature delegation”Amazon Technologiespriority 2016-12-23
Seed derives N one-time keys
✓
CLAIM 1“a master seed value… a set of one-time-use cryptographic keys from leaf nodes”
Keys committed in a Merkle tree
✓
CLAIM 1public keys “in a Merkle tree, with a root node serving as a public key”
Key marked spent after use
✓
CLAIM 2“marking one-time-use cryptographic keys as used after generating a digital signature”
Reuse prevented
✓
CLAIM 2“preventing reuse of marked one-time-use cryptographic keys”
Remaining count is the authority
✓
SPEC“a first counter of keys allocated… and a second counter of keys used”
Delegated to an agent
✓
CLAIM 1“providing the selected subordinate seed values to the one or more subordinates”
0of 6 elements found in one patent. Anticipation, not obviousness.
03 · Hostile review

Three attacks, written to kill it.

The arguments an investor or competitor would make. If you can’t answer these in the room, you don’t walk in.

1

“Signatures can’t prove non-reuse.”

The limit lives in a mutable counter. Two replicas that don’t share state hand the agent 2N actions, and neither notices.

2

“Just use short-lived tokens.”

The industry’s answer to blast radius is a 60-second token. The rebuttal is real, but it argues for counting, which AP2 already does.

3

“One Postgres row handles it.”

A single hot row sustains about 14,500 updates a second. A 1,000-action budget uses 7% of one second of it, total.

The one that ends the meeting
04 · Verdict

Four conditions. Then the stamp.

A business survives when a buyer can’t exit, the free fix is worse, no incumbent holds the segment, and harm converts to money.

Can the buyer legally exit?
test
Fail
Is the free fix worse?
test
Fail
No incumbent in the segment?
test
Fail
A forum where harm converts to money?
test
Pass
Do not file

The core mechanism was patented by Amazon in 2016. An examiner would reject the claim at first action.

$0provisional filing + attorney FTO search, not spent
What survives

The observation, not the mechanism. Two flagship commerce protocols mandate cumulative action limits and specify enforcement nowhere, and nobody ships action budgets for agents as a product. That is a business thesis worth building.

Pricing

Choose your depth.

Fixed price, no calls required to start. Send two to five sentences about the idea and who it is for.

BASIC · 24h

Landscape

$295
  • Competitor & funded-player map
  • Prior-art search: patents, papers, standards
  • Sourced, linked report
  • 1 revision
Order Landscape
Most founders pick this
STANDARD · 48h

Full Teardown

$595
  • Everything in Landscape
  • Hostile review: three strongest attacks
  • Four-condition survival test
  • Verdict and the narrow claim that survives
  • 2 revisions
Order Full Teardown →
PREMIUM · 72h

Investor-Ready

$1,150
  • Everything in Full Teardown
  • Investor question sheet: 10 questions, answered
  • Positioning rewrite that survives the report
  • Written walkthrough, plus 48 hours of follow-up questions by message
  • 3 revisions
Order Investor-Ready
Founding rate.The first five orders on Fiverr get Full Teardown at $350 and Investor-Ready at $690, in exchange for an honest review.Prefer Upwork?
The three-findings guarantee.If your report doesn’t surface at least three competitors, patents or papers you didn’t already list in your brief, you get a full refund through Fiverr or Upwork.

How it’s done

Every finding is checked by a person and linked to its source before it reaches you. AI tools do the breadth, hundreds of sources per report, so the person can spend their time on judgement: which patents actually read on your mechanism, and which attack would sink you. You can check every line of the work.

What it isn’t

Legal advice or a freedom-to-operate opinion. If the report finds a patent that reads on your idea, it says so and tells you to call an attorney, and you walk in knowing exactly which patent to ask about. NDA on request.

Confidentiality

How we handle your idea.

You are sending something you may not have told investors yet. This is exactly what happens to it.

01 · NDA

NDA first, if you want one.

Ask before you share any detail. Send your NDA and we sign it before you send the brief. We don’t negotiate terms. No NDA of your own? Use our mutual NDA.

02 · WHO SEES IT

One person, plus the research tools.

One person at Marklode reads your brief and reviews the report. The research runs on AI tools, currently Anthropic’s Claude, and every finding is checked by hand.

03 · PUBLIC SOURCES

We don’t tell anyone.

We search patents, papers, standards and funding news. We don’t contact your competitors, investors or anyone else about your idea.

04 · ONE USE

Used for your report, nothing else.

Your brief isn’t reused, resold or pitched to anyone. A report is published as a sample only with your written permission, as Stress Test No. 0001 was.

05 · AFTER DELIVERY

Yours to keep, or to have deleted.

The report is delivered through Fiverr or Upwork, and those platforms keep order messages under their own terms. Ask after delivery and we delete the brief, notes and report files we hold.

FAQ

Before you order.

The questions founders ask most, answered straight.

What do I need to send?

Two to five sentences about the idea, who the customer is and what they do today instead, any competitors you already know of (or “none known”), and whether you’re preparing to raise, file a patent or build. That last answer changes where the report puts its emphasis. No deck required.

How is this different from asking an AI to research it?

A model gives you a list; this gives you a verdict. Every claim is checked by a person and linked, the prior-art pass reads what the closest patents actually claim, and the hostile review is written to kill the idea, not to reassure you.

Will you tell me my idea is bad?

If the evidence says so, yes. That’s what you’re paying for. Most reports find the idea is partly taken and identify the part that isn’t, and that narrower claim is usually the one worth building.

Is this a patent search or legal advice?

It’s a prior-art landscape, not a legal opinion or a freedom-to-operate search. It finds the patents that matter and tells you what they claim, so your conversation with an attorney is short and specific.

What if you find nothing?

Then you get a report that says so, with the search recorded, so an investor can see the diligence was done. And if the report doesn’t surface at least three competitors, patents or papers you didn’t already list, the three-findings guarantee gives you a full refund.

Do you sign an NDA?

Yes. Send yours and we sign it before you share the brief, or use our mutual NDA. Nothing you share is used for any other purpose.

How fast is it?

24, 48 or 72 hours depending on the package. Rush delivery is available on Full Teardown and Investor-Ready.

How do payment, revisions and refunds work?

Orders run through Fiverr or Upwork, which handle payment, cancellations and refunds under their own terms. Landscape includes one revision, Full Teardown two and Investor-Ready three.

Not ready to order?Send your idea in one line and get back the first question an investor will ask you, within 24 hours, free.Send your idea
For developers

We counted the MCP registry.

The same diligence, pointed at the Model Context Protocol ecosystem. Recounted monthly; latest count October 2026.

Metadata only. Built from public registry APIs. No MCP server is ever contacted, probed or pinged.
0registry entries
0actual servers, once versions collapse
0with no source repository

1 dot ≈ 100 entries · ghosts are superseded versions · rust = no repo

Know before you spend,
not after.

Two to five sentences about the idea is all it takes to start. The verdict comes back in 24 to 72 hours.